These questions have been submitted by folks on the mailing list and answered by Dr. Moll, Director of the Thrombophilia Program at the Carolina Cardiovascular Biology Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, UNC Chapel Hill (North Carolina, USA). Why am I doing this?
Q1 "Everybody on the list talks about their INR. I have no idea what mine is."
A1:If you are not on warfarin (=coumadin®) your INR is, in most circumstances, normal (i.e. around 1 – usually between approximately 0.8 and
1.2). If a patient is on warfarin (=coumadin®), I strongly advise him/her to become familiar with his/her INR, ask the physician for the value each
time the INR is checked, and record it together with the warfarin (=coumadin®) dosing on a flow sheet (such as a coumadin® booklet or a spreadsheet).
Q2: "I am 57. I started having venous clots in my 20's. I am on a minimum of 10 mg coumadin daily with my PT kept between
19-25 at all times."
A2: The patient is referring to his/her PT measured in seconds: 19-25 sec. Only talking about the PT and not the INR is not good, because it may
lead to a wrong assessment of the warfarin (=coumadin®) effect, since the PT expressed in seconds is not standardized. Physicians and patients
should always use the INR (= International Normalized Ratio), never the “PT in seconds” or the “PT ratio”.
Q3: "What is the recommended range for PT and INR? I was reviewing my lab results when I was being diagnosed for thrombophilic conditions, and
I noticed that my INR prior to being diagnosed was 0.8. A note right below it said that the recommended range was 2 - 3, so I obviously was in trouble
at that time. Right now my INR is at 2.47. My doctor seems satisfied with that, and I am glad that the INR is closer to normal. But I just want to know
what my target INR should be".
A3: The terms “normal” and “recommended range” are something completely different. The term “normal” refers to the
INR value that patients have who are not on warfarin (=coumadin®). Thus, the value of 0.8 in the above patient was normal (normal INR is between
approximately 0.8 and 1.2). When a patient is treated with warfarin (=coumadin®), the goal is to thin the blood to a degree that the INR is increased
into a “recommended range” (= target INR range = therapeutic INR range). Your doctor should tell you your target INR range. The target INR
range for most patients with DVT or PE is 2.0 – 3.0, but may different in some patients
Q4: "I'm new to all of this FV Leiden stuff. I was going over some labs today and on one day my INR was 1.05. Does anyone
know what that means? From what I understand your INR should be between 2.5 and 3.0. Is having an INR of 1.05 for a normal person (someone who
does not have FV Leiden) dangerous enough that blood thinner should be used?"
A4: Mostly anybody who is not on warfarin (=coumadin®), whether he/she has factor V Leiden or not, has a normal INR, i.e. a value of approximately
0.8 to 1.2. Factor V Leiden does not influence the INR. Thus, the above patient’s INR of 1.05 was perfectly normal and expected. An INR value
in a person who is not on coumadin® never predicts whether that person will develop a clot or not. Thus, a value of 1.05 is not a reason to put
a person on a blood thinner.
Q5: "After my first clotting episode, I was put on Coumadin therapy for 3 months and will be resuming aspirin thereafter.
Once aspirin therapy begins, should INR testing continue? Is this practice unheard of?"
A5: INR testing should not continue. Once off warfarin (=coumadin®) your INR will be normal. Thus, there is no value in monitoring INRs in patients
who are not on warfarin (=coumadin®). Aspirin has no influence on the INR. I have never heard of that practice (and hope I never will).
Q6: "Is it true that Protein S deficiency directly affects the ability to keep the INRs at a consistent elevated level and
therefore significantly increases the amount of life-long testing needed to maintain the desired level."
A6:This is not correct. Protein S deficiency has no influence on the INR and has nothing to do with the way the INR is measured. INRs in patients
with protein S deficiency are just as easy (or difficult) to maintain as in patients who do not have protein S deficiency.
Warfarin (=coumadin® ) prevents your blood from clotting too easily. It does that by preventing some of the clotting factors in the liver from
being formed. Some people use the expression that warfarin (=coumadin® ) "thins" the blood, but, technically speaking, that term is not
correct: blood of patients on warfarin (=coumadin® ) is of normal thickness (= viscosity). It just takes longer to clot. However, as a figure of
speech the term "coumadin thins the blood" is often used. Everybody needs a different dose of coumadin and there is little that predicts how
much a person will need. It is therefore necessary to monitor the effect of coumadin so that the patient is not over- or underdosed. Otherwise, bleeding
or re-clotting may occur.
The PT (= prothrombin time; "protime") measures, how “thin” the blood is. It measures how many seconds the patient’s
blood plasma takes in the test tube to clot, after the plasma has been activated by an added lab reagent. The thinner the blood, the longer it takes to
clot, and the longer is the PT. Because the clotting time also depends on the strength of the lab reagent used, a value is calculated from the PT that
takes the strength of the reagent into consideration. The result is a value called INR (= International Normalized Ratio). This value is standardized,
making it comparable from one lab to the other: a value of 2.5 in one lab equals a value of 2.5 in another lab. The PT expressed in seconds is not standardized,
meaning that one gets discrepant results between different labs, and should therefore not be used to monitor warfarin (=coumadin®) therapy. The same
is true for the so-called “PT ratio”, which is unfortunately still used by some physicians and patients.
Interpreting the INR: